Search for: "State v. Watson" Results 581 - 600 of 963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2025, 4:31 am by Kalvis Golde
Watson Memorial Spiritual Temple of Christ 24-512Issue: Whether a prior federal judgment precludes state-law claims in a subsequent state- or federal-court action that arise from a common core of facts and that could have been, but were not, raised in the prior federal action. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm by Josh Blackman
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc (patents) Joined blue state amicus brief in Shelby County, Alabama v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:58 am by Graham Smith
Meanwhile in the UK the ISPs’ appeal to the Court of Appeal in Cartier v BSkyB (three judgments here, here and here) is pending. [read post]
15 May 2013, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
Watson Crick – one of the discoverers of DNA, opposes gene patenting: “Life’s instructions ought not be controlled by legal monopolies created at the whim of Congress or the courts”[v]. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:19 pm by Marie Louise
Merck (Kluwer Patent Blog) Keppra (Levetiracetam) – US: Orange Book patent listing precipitates DJ action to trigger generic Keppra XR 180-day exclusivity forfeiture: Par Pharmaceutical v UCB et al (FDA Law Blog) (Patent Docs) Naropin (Ropivacaine) – US: Judge O’Malley in dissent: Patent assignments should be a matter of state law: Abraxis BioScience v. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 12:06 pm by Rick Garnett
The principle of church autonomy was first recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in the post-Civil War case of Watson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:15 am by Anthony Carbone, PC
Previously, a workers’ compensation judge ordered medical marijuana payment in the matter of Watson v. 84 Lumber. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Michael Helfand
 I've recently attempted to present another alternative, which argues that the authority of religious institutions is derived from, to use the terminology of the Supreme Court in Watson v. [read post]