Search for: "State v. Word" Results 581 - 600 of 40,494
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am by Jeff Redding
  In other words, it would be as problematic to always categorize accounting as not part of the liberal arts as it would be to describe the United States fundamentally as a democracy. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:32 am by Florian Mueller
The Supreme Court of the United States just handed down its opinion in Alice v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am by Ingrid Wuerth
A 1781 Pennsylvania state court case against the state of Virginia, Nathan v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:44 am
It does not require an intent beyond that just stated. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Riccardo Calzavara, Arden Chambers
The Court of Appeal was bound by the decisions in Zalewska v Department for Social Development [2008] UKHL 67; [2008] 1 WLR 2602 and Kaczmarek v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 1310; [2009] PTSR 897. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:46 am by Kathy Kapusta
”   Several months later, in a meeting with a company vice president, the employee stated that he felt he was still being given staff-level work. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 11:50 am
  So I'd have used the word and expressed the sentiment. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ct. 1614, 1618 (2022) (Barrett, J.); United States v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 9:21 am by Amy Burns
” In other words, the would-be recipient of the communication must be a federal officer, but the defendant need not know that. [read post]