Search for: "Strickland" Results 581 - 600 of 2,272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2013, 2:27 am by Bob Kraft
“Inexperience and immaturity, combined with speed, drinking and driving, not wearing seat belts, distracted driving, and other teen passengers contribute to the high fatality rate of teens involved in fatal crashes,” said NHTSA Administrator David Strickland. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 11:09 pm by Cynthia Alkon
  The Court instead stated that the 1996 Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty (AEPDA) amendments in federal habeas law and Strickland v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm by Rory Little
  And AEDPA and Strickland, writes the Court, “do not permit federal judges to so casually second-guess the decisions of their state-court colleagues. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 3:02 pm
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Administrator David Strickland praised the new law stating, “Texting while driving is one of the most dangerous and irresponsible decisions a driver can make. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:40 am by Rory Little
  As he put it to close the day, “record silence under AEDPA and Strickland means the State wins. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:12 am by Rory Little
”  Such a universal rule seems directly contrary to Strickland. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:19 pm
  The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant's constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
Here, addressing the first prong of Strickland, defendant has failed to establish either that his counsel failed to provide any immigration advice or that she provided misinformation regarding the immigration consequences of his guilty plea. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 3:25 pm by Jon Sands
Nguyen concurs but believes that the standards for cause and prejudice remain the same under Martinez and Strickland. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm
The court further found that "the failure of the trial court to consider the importance of the omitted expert testimony in denying petitioner's motion to vacate the judgment of conviction is an unreasonable application of the Strickland standard". [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant has therefore established the first prong of the Strickland test - her counsel's performance fell below minimum standards of competent representation. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:38 am by Brian A. Comer
  Also, special thanks to my friends and former colleagues, Dick Willis and Angela Strickland, for calling this case to my attention. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:35 am by John L. Welch
Strickland Co., 160 USPQ 715, 717 (CCPA 1969).Petitioner did not dispute that the services in KCG's two registrations are essentially the same. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:59 am
Commissioner of Correction (Habeas; "The petitioner claims that the court erred in denying his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel because it (1) failed to consider all aspects of his claim relating to his criminal trial counsel’s failure to call a dog tracking expert and (2) improperly concluded that his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel failed to satisfy the prejudice prong of the two-pronged test set forth in Strickland v. [read post]