Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2011, 12:58 pm
Today, in this post, I’ll focus on what the Court had to say about habeas law in one of the decisions, Harrington v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
United States, 19-5652,Smith v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 pm
” Materiality In 1999, the Court in Strickland v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
v=sngL7nEGCj0 Experts worldwide agree, texting while driving represents a serious hazard to the safety of everyone on the road. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:45 am
Latif v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 am
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
United States and Yates v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 9:55 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
These include making a pitch for jury nullification (Strickland), letting the client commit perjury (Nix v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:08 am
Justice White concurring and dissenting in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
A 1992 case, Dedes v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:27 am
Determination of the ownership of the property is likely possible without resolving religious questions.United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:57 am
* United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 1:41 am
NASSAU COUNTYCriminal Practice
Defendant Fails to Satisfy 'Strickland' Test; Motion to Vacate Plea, Sentence Denied
People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:38 pm
The Supreme Court recognized in Strickland v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
The second is where appointed counsel in the initial-review collateral proceeding, where the claim should have been raised, was ineffective under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Strickland, 640 F.2d 774, 776 (5th Cir. 1981); In re Horob, 54 B.R. 693, 696 (Bankr. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:51 am
Caldwell v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 5:01 am
The second is where appointed counsel in the initial-review collateral proceeding, where the claim should have been raised, was ineffective under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm
Kulbicki 14-848Issue: Whether an appellate court violates the core principles of Strickland v. [read post]
