Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 14,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2015, 11:02 am
– Nampa Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:41 pm
"We have stated many times that 'federal habeas corpus relief does not lie for errors of state law.'" Swarthout, at 4 (quoting Estelle v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:00 am
Rakofsky v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:11 pm
Worse on law and policy, because it would indicate that standing for states under Massachusetts v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 6:38 am
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 2:06 am
The Supreme Court gave a strong policy reason for this stating that refugee status “is a matter of significance and engages this country’s international obligations. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:58 am
Strong Steel Doors, Inc. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
") (Koppe, M.J.); United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
In Friedman v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 4:11 pm
Africa v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
The case is made difficult by respondents’ strong arguments that they will suffer irreparable harm because, despite a congressional finding to the contrary, marijuana does have valid therapeutic purposes. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:00 pm
United States. [read post]
17 May 2018, 10:00 pm
The U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:37 am
Fittante expects that more states will look to raise additional revenues through similar taxation methods or through the misclassification of franchisees as independent contractors v. employees. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:55 am
Happy Birthday Marbury v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
In her recent concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 2:57 pm
On March 17, the Second District Court of Appeal issued another strong decision for employees in Sanchez v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 8:17 am
Agrizap v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:42 pm
"We have observed that evidence impeaching an eyewitness may not be material if the state's other evidence is strong enough to sustain confidence in the verdict," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority. [read post]
