Search for: "Supreme Court of the State of Delaware"
Results 581 - 600
of 3,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2007, 9:56 pm
23, 2007), read opinion here, (yes, that is the correct spelling of the plaintiff's name), the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Delaware... [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 2:22 pm
The Supreme Court reversed. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:30 am
"And:Those inmates are in Florida and seven other states - California, Delaware, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska and South Carolina - according to a Florida State University study. [read post]
5 May 2016, 4:45 pm
The Court of Appeals accepted two certified questions from the Delaware Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 9:00 am
Having found a clear basis in the contract to support its fee award, the Supreme Court declined the opportunity to broaden its ruling and have Delaware address an emerging trend in other states to treat a one-sided fee provision as a mutual fee-shifting provision. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:00 pm
Supr., No. 534, 2013 (May 8, 2014), highlighted here on these pages, in which the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the facial validity of fee-shifting bylaws for a non-stock corporation. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 2:20 pm
POSTSCRIPT: Several years ago, a Delaware Supreme Court opinion was highlighted on these pages, addressing a related issue of what penalties are appropriate for missing pretrial deadlines. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:42 am
Shirley Werner Kornreich, Justice of the New York State Supreme Court (Commercial Division) CLE credit: This program offers 2 CLE credits, transitional and non-transitional To register: http://goo.gl/jpo9R Questions? [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:30 am
Examen Inc., 871 A.2d 1108 (2005), the Delaware Supreme Court considered this point and found that California could not constitutionally impose its corporate governance laws on a Delaware corporation that was governed by the Delaware General Corporation Law. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 10:01 am
In the recent opinion by the Delaware Supreme Court of Chancery in City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
The attendees include four of the five members of the Delaware Court of Chancery and three of the five members of the Delaware Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 6:08 pm
However, until passage of the amended Section 102(b)(7) this year, corporations could not do the same for its officers, even though the Delaware Supreme Court repeatedly affirmed that officers owe the same fiduciary duties as directors. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:13 pm
Answering a question from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the en banc Delaware Supreme Court ruled that shareholders cannot maintain a derivative action under the fraud exception to Delaware’s continuous ownership rule after a merger that divests them of their ownership interest in the corporation on whose behalf they sue by alleging that the merger at issue was necessitated by, and is inseparable from, the alleged fraud that is the subject of… [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 11:50 am
The defendant successfully moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction based on the seminal ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Shaffer v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:18 am
In a May 23, 2014 New York Times article (here), Ohio State Law Professor Steven Davidoff noted the “hysteria” that had followed in wake of the Delaware Supreme Court’s ruling. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:56 pm
The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 1:45 pm
Several prior decisions in this matter by both the Delaware Supreme Court (whose stately building in Dover is featured at right), and the Court of Chancery were summarized on these pages and highlighted and linked in a previous post. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 7:10 pm
Former Delaware Supreme Court Chief Justice E. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
Steele, Chief Justices of the Delaware Supreme Court on Aug. 13 before the American Bar Association on this approach. [read post]
15 May 2018, 12:56 pm
Yesterday The Supreme Court reiterated that it is not the business of the federal government to regulate the way state governments regulate their citizens. [read post]
