Search for: "THOMAS C STEVENS"
Results 581 - 600
of 802
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm
ROBERTS, C. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:29 pm
Posner, How Judges Think (new in paperback) Steven D. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
” Justice Stevens has not expressed strong opinions. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:03 pm
So concluded the Court in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor and joined by Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Stevens, Justice Thomas, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer (who also wrote a separate, concurring opinion). [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 11:56 am
C. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:10 pm
C. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:51 pm
J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which STEVENS, SCALIA, KENNEDY, THOMAS, GINSBURG, BREYER, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:58 pm
He pointed out that he’s had the broadest base of law school grads as clerks, with the possible exception of Justice Stevens. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:55 am
C-SPAN.org has video of the National Journal’s Stuart Taylor discussing the Stevens vacancy and possible nominees. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:22 am
C’mon, you gotta give that to me. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:21 pm
J., and STEVENS, THOMAS, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined, an opin-ion with respect to Parts II–B and II–D, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 11:58 am
But only if we witness one of the most awesome role-reversals ever to come to C-Span. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm
Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:16 am
(I don't think any of them is likely to be the author of Bilski.) 2 each for Justices Roberts, Thomas, Alito, and Sotomayor. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:56 am
Thomas (No. 09-5201) is perhaps best summed up through the terse words of Justice Stevens. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:45 pm
J., and STEVENS, THOMAS, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined, an opin-ion with respect to Parts II–B and II–D, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:19 am
J., and STEVENS, THOMAS, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined, an opinion with respect to Parts II–B and II–D, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:17 pm
J., and Stevens, Thomas, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined, an opinion with respect to Parts II–B and II–D, in which Roberts, C. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 8:41 am
C, in which THE CHIEF JUSTICE and JUSTICE THOMAS join. [. . .] [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
Thomas, which were previewed for SCOTUSblog by Troy Cahill and Carl Cecere, respectively. [read post]
