Search for: "Tam v. State" Results 581 - 600 of 1,447
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2017, 3:21 am
The USPTO, while awaiting the outcome of the Tam case, has suspended the examination of all pending cases involving issues of disparagement and scandalousness under Section 2(a).As Ted Davis notes, the Board hewed to its strict position regarding fraud, leaving its Nationstar v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am by Steve Baird
Tam to overcome the disparagement refusal. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:48 am by Joy Waltemath
Rather, looking to the plain language of the relevant FCA provision, the appeals court followed the Fifth and Sixth Circuits, and held the attorney general has absolute veto power over voluntary qui tam settlements (U.S. ex rel Michaels and Whitesides v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
Tam to allow the trademarking of stereotypical slurs or other hateful terms. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 8:02 am by thatagency
  On January 31, 2017 in Washington, D.C. the United States Tax Court finally issued their final decision in case number 21276-13W v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am by Tiffany Blofield
  The case involving the REDSKINS mark is currently on hold until the United States Supreme Court decides the In re Tam case. [read post]
By Kiran Jassal The Supreme Court of the United States recently heard oral arguments for Lee v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Packingham v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  That’s true in tax benefits.RT: That’s all cool, and if Tam were denied any registration at all until he stopped using the name, Rowland would be right. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Laura McKenna discusses Endrew F. v. [read post]