Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes" Results 581 - 600 of 769
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The Judge accepted that Ms B intended to return tot he Highbury flat, but could not be sure quite when at the relevant time.The Judge then referred to Brown v Brash and Ambrose [1948] 2 KB 247 and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1987) 20 HLR 108, and finished:It seems to me that these 2 cases are authority for the proposition that if Ms Boyle had an intention to return to Avenell Mansions at some time in the future – and I think that that time in the future… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:10 am by Edward Hartnett
On Tuesday, December 6, the Court heard argument in a case – Martel v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 10:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The following are the people, with their former addresses, excluded as of October 20 and October 27, 2010. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am by Melina Padron
Preston, R (on the application of) v Wandsworth Borough Council & Anor [2011] EWHC 3174 (Admin) (01 December 2011) December 1, 2011 High Court: Removal of voting rights for people who leave UK for over 15 years not contrary to EU freedom of movement law, although could in principle if rules “unjustifiably interfere with the freedom of movement”. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Dr Damian Tambini discusses Hugh Tomlinson’s Inforrm post asking “Should journalists have privileges? [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
“There already is a rather strong regulation against hacking people’s telephones – the law. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:17 am by INFORRM
  After that the harassment and intimidation reached what were plainly unbearable levels: “On some afternoons in the last few days there have been ten or more people outside her house. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am by INFORRM
The article, which appeared in The People, had wrongly alleged she was to be investigated over allegations of slavery. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Judgment was reserved by the Court of Appeal in Cambridge v Makin on Thursday 3 November 2011, the Court of Appeal (Hughes, Black and Tomlinson LJJ). [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:31 pm by Quinn Norton
Anons the world over are celebrating by drinking, watching V for Vendetta, crying over how cute kitten pictures are, and posting pages and pages of famous peoples’ personal data all over the web. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:46 am by Steve McConnell
They are also now big, big litigation.You might think that last week's decision in Hughes v Mylan, Inc., 2011 U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
But using history appropriately is about more than finding nice sounding quotes from important people. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Ferdinand v MGN, heard 4 to 6 July 2011 (Nicol J) WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:22 am by Graeme Hall
(An example could include increasing protections for older people; a topic which the Human Rights in Ireland blog considers here). [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 9:28 am by Jeff Gamso
Hughes (C.A. 5, 1976), 542 F. 2d 246, 248. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:15 pm by INFORRM
After  they had left, he interviewed a waitress and some of the people eating at the restaurant. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 8:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Fully litigated prior restraints presumptively unconstitutional—Near v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Justin Hughes: Sampling problem may go away with tech. [read post]