Search for: "The United States District Court for the Central District of California"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
“[P]eriodic bouts of litigation in federal district court, starting in 1975” – with Martha’s regulatory taking action seeking $6 million for County’s downzoning of its property from a minimum of 300 to a maximum of 27 units – resulted in “two stipulated judgments, one in 1976, the other in 2007[,]” the “most significant aspect [of which] was that the County twice solemnly – and publicly – agreed to… [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:10 am
An initial hearing was scheduled for yesterday in the Central District of California regarding the suit five U.S. sugar companies -- American Sugar Refining Inc., C&H Sugar Co. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:36 pm
Our amicus in the case of United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 4:02 am
District Court for the Central District of California (no reasoning provided within the opinion)Boston Scientific Scimed (formerly known as Scimed Life Systems) v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
Verizon removed the cased to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
As Judge McShane of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon wrote in Rummel v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 6:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm
In 2007, the District Court for the Central District of California granted summary judgment in favor of Hana Bank on the basis of its trademark priority. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:35 pm
That same year, federal prosecutors in the Central District of California concluded a customs-related false statements prosecution on the west coast, according to information contained in the criminal complaint against Sareen. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
This policy is also evident in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Central District of California, which encourage facilitating the settlement of cases. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:39 am
The California Supreme Court granted review. [read post]
International Banking and Finance Provide Grounds for Removal of State Court Action to Federal Court
26 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
There is multi-district litigation pending in the federal court in the Central District of California, but the multi-district rules do not appear to permit the transfer and consolidation of cases pending in state, as opposed to federal, court. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 9:33 am
” On October 17, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States vacated the Ninth Circuit’s ruling and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Southwest Airlines Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am
., April 2, 2013), the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the state of Texas had failed to adequately justify under RLUIPA its policy of prohibiting prisoners from wearing beards for religious reasons.In United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:56 am
In the decision, the United States District Court for the Central District of California held that the Service had violated the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by improperly relying on “core populations” of the kangaroo rat to determine critical habitat. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
The United States undoubtedly has robust public policy favoring free expression. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:21 am
District Court for the Central District of California recently held that the first sale doctrine permits a recipient of promotional CDs to sell them online without violating the license pursuant to which the CDs were distributed and without being liable for copyright infringement. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
District Court for the Central District of California recently held that the first sale doctrine permits a recipient of promotional CDs to sell them online without violating the license pursuant to which the CDs were distributed and without being liable for copyright infringement. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 1:32 pm
On March 25 he filed a complaint in front of California Central District Court ( case number 2:2016cv02063 ) against McDonald’s alleging “blatant, unlawful, and pervasive copying and use of Plaintiff s artwork, name, and trademark in advertising campaigns around the world, without his consent“. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:06 am
Attorney Martin Estrada for the Central District of California. [read post]
