Search for: "Thomas v. No Named Defendants" Results 581 - 600 of 1,976
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am by Hannah R. Albion
In summary, the court ruled that the exclusion of Lanham Act liability, established by the Second Circuit precedent (Rogers v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In any event, both statutes give defendant clear notice of what is prohibited — namely, possession of an unlicensed firearm and possession of an air pistol — and explicit standards to the police for applying the statutes (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d at 422). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:50 am by Rosalind English
As far as the claim under the harassment Act was concerned, the judge considered that there was sufficient evidence in this case that the conduct by the applicant’s unknown persecutors caused alarm and distress, thus amounting to “harassment” under the Act (Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd (2001) EWCA Civ 1233. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” Patchak argued that while the Gun Lake Act had the form of legislation, in substance it was an effort to resolve a concrete case—namely his.For the plurality, Justice Thomas appeared to concede in principle. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:43 am by Susan Brenner
  [A[lthough `[t]he simple existence of some statutory ambiguity is not sufficient’ to trigger automatic resolution of the ambiguity in favor of a defendant, U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:44 am by SHG
And so too that damn empathetic Latina, who’s name shall go unmentioned. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 12:39 am
The dispute over the unauthorized publication of the private etchings of Prince Albert and the recognition of a right in confidences was still over 50 years away (Prince Albert v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
However, this time, Bouvier was not a defendant in this case. [read post]