Search for: "Thompson v. People" Results 581 - 600 of 827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hamilton, 59 F.3d 1058, 1073 (10th Cir. 1995) (upholding a narrowly drawn criminal libel statute); People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
United States Last week, President Biden established the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which appears will be focusing particularly on online harms which “disproportionately affect women, girls, people of colour and LGBTQI+ individuals” with “technology-facilitated gender-based violence” its top priority. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On the 6 December 2016 Channel 4 News has issued an apology after a subtitling error wrongly claimed Boris Johnson had discussed whether “people of colour” should be allowed into the UK, in reality, Johnson said he was in favour of having “people of talent” come to the UK, and did not discuss race. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:36 pm
Among the judgments issued during Kagan's OT '87 clerkship for Justice Thurgood Marshall was Thompson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:41 am by SHG
Thompson, 304 Kan. ___, ___ P.3d ___ (No. 110,318, this day decided). [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has a similar piece focusing on issues surrounding DNA testing as has the Thomson Reuters Foundation which has noted the increasing trend of people using DNA test kits. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Thompson, No. 07-1014 "Denial of a petition for federal habeas relief is affirmed over petitioner's arguments that: 1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel during his state trial for murder; 2) the revised 28 U.S.C. section 2254(d)(1) violates Article III, the separation of powers, and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 3:35 am by SHG
That's the backdrop to the Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 4:17 am by David J. DePaolo
The Americans with Disability Act (ADA) can produce some strange results when matters are litigated, and a recent Texas case demonstrates that even if an employer thinks it is doing the right thing it still may be in violation of the law.In City of Houston v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:14 am by abiinniss
I want to explore whether more people can resolve their disputes in a way that leads to faster and more satisfactory solutions. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 4:17 am by David J. DePaolo
The dissent by Justice Kem Thompson Frost argued that "the trial evidence would not allow reasonable and fair-minded people to find that the city actually regarded Proler as having a physical or mental impairment that substantially limited a major life activity." [read post]