Search for: "Tucker, Matter of"
Results 581 - 600
of 745
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2011, 7:01 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0209, 2011 MT 51, BITTERROOT RIVER PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff and Appellee, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS, Involuntary Plaintiff, v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 7:40 am
And no matter what side you are on, the standard of review is a consideration in settlement negotiations while the appeal is pending, because it affects the chances of prevailing. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
The episode was telecast on February 12, 2009 with the exception the last name "Tucker" was substituted for "Tamkin. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
However, the real conflict in the film was familial in nature: Big Law corporate defense attorney Maggie Ward (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio), who represents the automotive company in the suit, is the estranged daughter of Jedediah Tucker Ward (Gene Hackman), the flamboyant plaintiffs’ attorney who brought the suit. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:46 am
It just seems so far-fetched as a practical matter, and so easily rebutted in terms of the substance. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:21 am
Developer for Wiping Evidence - http://tinyurl.com/49u3kmc (Katheryn Hayes Tucker) Social Media and Intellectual Property Risks – http://tinyurl.com/4qk5fug (Pria Chetty) Social Networking Compliance: A Guide for IT Teams – http://tinyurl.com/4cfny3q (Paul Kozenlowski) Texas Court of Appeals is Soft on Hard Drives – http://tinyurl.com/67exvpy (Mallory Griffin) The California Bar Weighs in on Legal Ethics in the Cloud – http://bit.ly/dLEAWh (Robert Ambrogi) Throwing… [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:30 pm
(But the exceptions don’t matter here.) [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 2:38 pm
Maybe they're buying into what Julie Bates, the elected Lucas County Prosecutor told them: It's an important thing for everyone to consider always, but the law is the only thing that matters. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 5:31 pm
Cir. 2001), the court concluded that a Tucker Act remedy was not available and that the CFC had no subject matter jurisdiction because Congress has provided a "comprehensive statutory scheme" to review property forfeitures. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:24 am
Tucker and Tucker & Ludin, P.A. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:46 am
No matter how much hilarity ensues, all guys flinch at the moment of impact. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
In 2010, 60% of Tucker Ellis & West’s revenues came from non-hourly fees. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:47 pm
The court interpreted the complaint as seeking to allege a conspiracy between the USPTO, Topco, Martian Tucker, and China to defraud Pupols. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:47 pm
The court stated that it would limit the officer’s testimony to the matters described in the witness designation and that it would give a curative instruction to the jury in the event that the officer’s testimony crossed into the realm of expert opinion. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 11:53 am
I am employed by Rhodes, Hieronymus, Jones, Tucker & Gable in Tulsa, Oklahoma as a senior certified paralegal and have been with this firm for over 15 years. 2. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
Co. v Tucker, 273 AD2d 683 [2000]). [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
Therefore, as a matter of apparent first impression, the District Court of Appeal held that the defendant was not a "wrongfully incarcerated person" entitled to compensation under the Victims of Wrongful Incarceration Compensation Act. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 6:59 pm
Why is a case involving the Indian Tucker Act and the technicalities of the CFC's subject matter jurisdiction showing up in the pages of this blog? [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 8:52 am
A federal trial court in Arkansas sentenced her to three years of home detention rather than the guideline-recommended 155 to 188 months in prison, citing Tucker’s age among other matters. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:26 am
I will fight to the end, and in the end, no matter what, I'm gonna win either way. [read post]
