Search for: "U.S. v. JACOBS"
Results 581 - 600
of 895
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am
The case is U.S. [read post]
30 May 2013, 4:00 am
Jacobs. [read post]
29 May 2013, 2:38 pm
The new case, Linchpins of Liberty v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 7:19 am
Jacobs of Greenwire reports that the ruling “could be a boon” for the Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
At Greenwire, Jeremy Jacobs discusses the possible impact that Clapper v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:08 pm
Department of Health and Human Services; Jacob Lew, in his capacity as Secretary of the U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:39 am
That issue brought about a slugfest in the Second Circuit last week.The case is Poventud v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
The Court asked for the views of the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm
Regarding overheard conversations in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:50 am
Regarding overheard conversations in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:03 pm
That was 50 years ago today, in Gideon v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
In one of a series of rulings in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in National Australia Bank v. [read post]
UK judge declines Samsung's job offer, invalidates three 3G standard-essential patents in Apple case
7 Mar 2013, 5:21 am
Most recently a Samsung lawsuit against Apple's voiceover feature (which matters a great deal to blind and vision-impaired users) was stayed.Justice Floyd appears unlikely to follow in Sir Robin Jacob's footsteps and work for Samsung as an expert witness in USITC investigations.The ITC has a deadline later today for a final ruling on Samsung's request for a U.S. import ban against Apple. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:16 am
The U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:55 am
On March 18, Texas will mark the 50th year of Gideon v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:20 am
Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 7:20 am
Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Ballard’s expert witness, a retired U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
Jacob Gershman of The Wall Street Journal, Alison Frankel of Reuters, and Nathan Hale of Law360 (subscription required) (hat tip: How Appealing) report that the U.S. government has asked the Court to decide whether Congress’s decision to block cost-of-living increases for federal judges violates the Compensation Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
