Search for: "US v. Francisco" Results 581 - 600 of 3,353
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm by Amy Howe
” No court, he argued, had ever upheld Congress’ use of its subpoena power to obtain the personal papers of a sitting president. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:12 pm by Peter Margulies
Indeed, in a December 2019 Ninth Circuit ruling, City & Cty. of San Francisco v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:26 am by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
The second-largest plaintiffs’ verdict in 2019 was $845 million, as reported by the Daily Journal, which was awarded to ASML, a Dutch semiconductor chip processing software company, in its case against XTAL, a company founded by two ex-employees of the plaintiff’s subsidiary in Santa Clara who allegedly worked in secret for XTAL using stolen trade secrets to get a head start in development and siphon off a major customer contract (ASML US Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:31 pm
   But the real reason to read the opinion is simply to take a peek into a slightly different world than the one in which most of us typically live. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
., 2020 ABASC 40 (CanLII) —… https://t.co/1mUxKHC34t 2020-04-12 No reasonable expectation of privacy in message sent in a group chat R. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
., 2020 ABASC 40 (CanLII) —… https://t.co/1mUxKHC34t 2020-04-12 No reasonable expectation of privacy in message sent in a group chat R. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
., 2020 ABASC 40 (CanLII) —… https://t.co/1mUxKHC34t 2020-04-12 No reasonable expectation of privacy in message sent in a group chat R. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:21 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Be proactive about your situation and contact us today to help file your request for Satisfactory Departure. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:55 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
The letter includes a list of practical considerations and questions for firms to use as guidance in evaluating their compliance, supervisory, and risk management program. [read post]