Search for: "US v. Hart" Results 581 - 600 of 1,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2017, 7:16 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
’ Since the Town Board left itself this latitude to identify additional areas in the future, the petitioner did not ‘establish a clear conflict with the comprehensive plan’ (Matter of Hart v Town Bd. of Town of Huntington, 114 AD3d at 683, quoting Infinity Consulting Group, Inc. v Town of Huntington, 49 AD3d at 814). [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:16 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
’ Since the Town Board left itself this latitude to identify additional areas in the future, the petitioner did not ‘establish a clear conflict with the comprehensive plan’ (Matter of Hart v Town Bd. of Town of Huntington, 114 AD3d at 683, quoting Infinity Consulting Group, Inc. v Town of Huntington, 49 AD3d at 814). [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
Shawn Russell Harte Issue: Whether an underlying felony can be used both as a theory for a felony-murder conviction and also as an aggravating circumstance allowing the jury to consider capital punishment, and if Nevada’s statutory scheme adequately narrows the class of individuals eligible for the death penalty. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am by GuestPost
(This issue of using referendum results as evidence of a majority position is further discussed below.) [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am by Kelly
(IP Spotlight) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: The great haste and less milling: Beer v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 10:12 am by Ron Coleman
@ericgoldmanVenkat Blog Post: Court Smacks Down Lawyer Who Tries to Enforce Copyright in 23 Word Email–Stern v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
When I joined Verio, there were about 200 of us. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 7:29 pm by Francis Pileggi
It applies Section 327 of the Delaware General Corporation Law using the state supreme court’s ruling in 7547 Partners v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 6:47 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Indeed, some Nigerian judges have rightly held that choice of venue rules are not supposed to be used to determine matters of jurisdiction in Nigerian conflict of laws.[7] Choice of venue rules are used to determine which judicial division within a State (in the case of the State High Court) or judicial division within the Nigerian Federation (in the case of the Federal High Court) has jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Guantanamo was central to the Bush Administration’s prevention of the judicial review of the legal status of prisoners, a position invalidated by the Supreme Court in Boumediene v. [read post]