Search for: "US v. Louis"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 4:51 am
Kidron v Suris & Assoc., P.C. 2024 NY Slip Op 02503 Decided on May 07, 2024Appellate Division, First Department reminds us that there are vast differences between the law in the First Department and the law in the Second Department, both of which are in the State of New York. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 3:04 am
The case cite is Boyds Coffee Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 4:48 am
Louis Vuitton???????? [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:17 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:18 am
The initials “LV” could stand for Louis Vuitton, as the Complainant alleges in Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
Louis Vuitton, S.A., 766 S.W.2d 377, 378-79 (Tex. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:47 am
See US v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
It followed its recent decision of Jean-Louis v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:24 pm
In Kurns et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:05 am
Among the significant cases addressing this issue are Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347; Branti v Finkel, 445 US 507 and Rutan v Republican Party of Illinois, 497 US 62.* Although the decision does not address Miller’s probationary obligation, "probationary employees" in fact hold permanent appointments and may enjoy limited tenure rights. [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:09 am
The first one is a discussion of the case of Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe v Louis Karel Fick by Erika de Wet. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:40 am
“McCutcheon v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:12 pm
V. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:29 am
” Louis Vuitton, 868 F. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
Nov. 21, 2016) Selected blog posts on trademark dilution: * Brief Brand Reference in TV Ad Constitutes Trademark Dilution–Louis Vuitton v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:55 pm
VERCAMMEN1 Court cannot consider Suppression Motion testimony unless agreed by defendant State v Gibson __ NJ __ A-11-132 US Supreme Court requires warrant before taking of blood in DWI Missouri v McNeely 133 S. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:42 am
A Very Long Limitation Period for Unjust Enrichment Claims in McConnell v HuxtableEx-lawyer who used his firm’s credit card to start new firm gets probationIs Rob Ford baiting anti-gay voters? [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:30 am
Here is how Adam Liptak opens his piece on Need-Blind Justice: “Fifty years ago, in Gideon v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:52 am
GuestKat Thomas Key discussed the ruling, issued by the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals in 50 cent v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 7:37 am
Louis. [read post]
