Search for: "US v. Sierra" Results 581 - 600 of 899
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2016, 6:50 pm by Andrew Sabey
Another case offering an opportunity to clarify the CEQA standard of review is Sierra Club v Fresno. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:50 pm by Andrew Sabey
Another case offering an opportunity to clarify the CEQA standard of review is Sierra Club v Fresno. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 2:27 pm
The applicant indicated that because of these various incidents, he fled Liberia for Sierra Leone, then went to Libya and Italy, and using a false passport and traveling through Spain, attempted to enter the U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
A comment on Cartier v BSkyB http://t.co/Iax2rJKr9v -> Impending Lapse of PIPA Creates Uncertainty http://t.co/2uNTiVOPce -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-10-17: Rob Ford's medical records accessed by 2 unauthorized hospit… http://t.co/Dwff5VNmbJ -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-10-17 http://t.co/lBTXeVU1yR -> [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 9:35 am
Recent examples from Hawaii courts include: The Hawaii Superferry case, Sierra Club v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm by Michael Zischke
EIR evaluated four-acre downtown mixed use project First case applying standards of review from Sierra Club v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
  Drawing amicus support from the Sierra Club as well as the island municipality of Vieques, Puerto Rico – famous for its crystal-clear waters, sweeping vistas, and the occasional deposit of depleted uranium – Sanchez v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]