Search for: "US v. Taylor"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 3:22 am
Last week, the Human Rights Tribunal released a very interesting decision in which discriminatory comments made by a union president on the union’s blog raised the issue of competing human rights – namely the right to be free from discrimination in the workplace vs the right to freedom of expression and association: Taylor-Baptiste v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:05 pm
Stitt and Stokeling v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 11:30 pm
" And Taylor A.R. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:56 am
Indeed, Quarles v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:02 am
Taylor, 2010 U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 11:08 am
Case citation: Greer v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:26 am
The Appellate Division ruled that Hankin attempted to use the subpoena duces tecum improperly and such a subpoena "may not be used for purposes of discovery or to ascertain the existence of evidence" [Board of Educ. of City of New York v Hankins 294 A.D.2d 360].** Sometimes an individual served with disciplinary charges will demand "a bill of particulars" requiring the appointing authority to set out the charges and specifications filed against the… [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:42 am
Order Reversing Judgment and Sentence November 14, 2013Case Name: TAYLOR FORREST COBB v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 9:02 am
On September 16, 2015, the federal government decided to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada the case of Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 4:46 am
Discontinuing General Municipal Law Section 207-c disability benefitsGamma v Bloom, 274 AD2d 14In Gamma, the Appellate Division concluded that an agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law can set out the controlling procedures for resolving disputes concerning Section 207-c benefits, including resolving any dispute concerning light duty assignments and the continuation of such benefits through arbitration.City of Newburgh police officer Stephen J. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:25 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 3:27 am
" Great Concepts, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
Compare RESTATEMENT (2D) AGENCY § 219 & comment c (master can use servant's defenses); RESTATEMENT (2D) AGENCY § 217 (master can assert servant's defenses with exception of privileges based on status); Carter v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 7:19 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm
By Lindsey Taylor The issue of employees with environmental sensitivities often arises for Canadian employers. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:00 pm
The local government needed to identify a public use at the time of the property’s condemnation, not later. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:05 am
The Supreme Court uses an inmate suicide case to remind us how hard it is to hold individual government defendants liable in constitutional cases whey they can assert qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that shields them from litigation when the state of the law is not clearly-established at the time of the violation.The case is Taylor v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 12:06 pm
Prior to O’Neil this legal issue had been addressed by the California Court of Appeal, most notably in Taylor v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" Observing that "the public policy exception to the arbitrability of public sector labor disputes is narrow," the Court of Appeals sustained the arbitration award, observing that the promotional practices of a public employer constitute a term or condition of employment that may be determined through collective bargaining under the Taylor Law.In contrast, however, determining the seniority rights in some situations are statutory such as determining an employee's… [read post]
