Search for: "USA v. State of Texas" Results 581 - 600 of 883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Marissa Miller
University of Texas at Austin – is a “young woman whose dreams were dashed because of discrimination sanctioned by the state . . . [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
The dispute had no connection with Texas, but Texas at that time had no doctrine of forum non conveniens. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am by Andrew Hamm
” At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein argues that United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolfe reports that the court “appeared likely to side with the Trump administration in its effort to end a program that lets nearly 700,000 young, undocumented immigrants live and work in the United States without fear of deportation. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 1:00 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Also see -- > account stated and contractual choice of law.EXAMPLES OF CHANGE IN TERMS NOTICES BY CREDIT CARD ISSUERS US Bank Reservation of Right to Change Credit Terms:[more forthcoming]LACK OF PROOF OF ORIGINAL APR AND/OR CHANGES IN RATES OVER TIMEIn Tully v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:58 am by Lorene Park
Moreover, evidence that the restaurant manager laughed along with the harassers was enough to grant summary judgment to the employees on their state law claim against him individually as well (D’Annunzio v Ayken, Inc dba Ayhan’s Fish Kebab Restaurant). [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
Mazars USA — which involved congressional subpoenas — is a “mixed decision. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
The court, split 5-4 along ideological lines, yesterday also put on hold a lower-court order that would have required Texas to redraw congressional and state district lines to cure voting-rights problems. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The Court will not hear an appeal of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision which reversed the lower court’s ruling that the State of Texas had violated the Endangered Species Act in its administration of the state water permitting program which allegedly denied adequate amounts of fresh water at the Aransas, Texas Whooping Crane preserve. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]