Search for: "Union v. Young*"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2007, 1:50 pm
A unanimous panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court, an intermediate appellate court, ruled on April 30 in Jacob v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:18 am
In Vance v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:48 pm
The new case law, McCormick v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:19 am
Briefly, Fredreka Schouten at USA Today writes that a Court ruling in favor of the petitioners in Citizens United may drastically alter 2010 state gubernatorial elections by loosening restrictions on previously prohibited corporate and union donations, while the Boston Globe reports that the firefighters in Ricci v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm
The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights R (S) v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:35 am
East Hampton Union Free School District, a fight broke out among high school track team members. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 1:42 pm
See Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 12:50 am
In Fox Television, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:35 am
East Hampton Union Free School District, a fight broke out among high school track team members. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:19 am
Union, AFL-CIO/CLC, 2013 WL 4648333 (W.D. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am
” At OurFuture.org, Sam Pizzigati argues that in Janus v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:35 am
Perry v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
EEOC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 7:36 am
The suit that Quindlen is probably referring to, Frank v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:14 am
Back in October of last year the IPKat posted this item on the Court of Justice of the European Union reference for a preliminary ruling in the WEBSHIPPING trade mark dispute, Case C-235/09 DHL Express (France) SAS v Chronopost SA. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am
First, in relation to the EU legal system, Simon Crowther reports on the Court of Appeal’s decision to refer the case of ZZ v Home Office to the Court of Justice of the European Union asking whether EU citizens are entitled under EU law to see the “essence of the grounds against them“ when facing exclusion in the name of national security. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:52 am
From the unions’ perspective, the better these programs work, the more they need to be stopped. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
The DPF replaces the Privacy Shield Framework which was invalidated by the Schrems II decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in July 2020. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
Nixon v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:45 am
But see United We Stand Am., Inc. v. [read post]
