Search for: "United States v. Abed" Results 581 - 600 of 820
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2020, 6:42 pm by Unknown
For example, Amazon argued that it did not set the price for third-party products and therefore cannot “spread the cost of defects across units sold. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
KG v OHIM (IPKat) AG supports AB InBev’s case in BUD appeal: Anheuser-Busch v Bud? [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Victoria and Richard MacKenzie-Childs (Property, Intangible) TTAB finds service mark application void ab initio for non-use because services were not rendered prior to filing: Parametric Technology Corporation v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Victoria and Richard MacKenzie-Childs (Property, Intangible) TTAB finds service mark application void ab initio for non-use because services were not rendered prior to filing: Parametric Technology Corporation v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Department of Justice and was an assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm by Benjamin Bissell
The review will reportedly examine how the United States engages with families of those kidnapped, its methods of intelligence collection, and its diplomatic missions to rescue hostages. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:22 am by Trachtman
An old example is the Uniting for Peace Resolution of the General Assembly of the UN (GA Res. 377(V), of 3 November 1950), which empowered the General Assembly to act in cases of threat to the peace or breach of the peace when, due to the veto of one of its permanent Members, the UN Security Council failed to exercise its ‘primary responsibility’ for maintaining international peace and security. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]