Search for: "United States v. Blanket"
Results 581 - 600
of 865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2024, 11:18 pm
The current case of Kaiser v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:44 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am
United States, 19-402Issues: (1) Whether National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am
In a 2011 letter to Hillary Clinton, United States Senator Orrin Hatch opposed the Fund’s pro generic drugs procurement policy. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
"And indeed, as pointed out in Bishop Lawrence's response to the petition for mandamus, just one day before filing its motion for enforcement with Judge Dickson, ECUSA had filed a brief in opposition to Bishop Lawrence's petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ to review the August 2017 decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court (p. 4):On May 7, 2018, Petitioners [in the Circuit Court, i.e., ECUSA and its diocese] argued to the United… [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
JOAN BAYEv.MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.Civil Action No. 17-4789.United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
JOAN BAYEv.MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.Civil Action No. 17-4789.United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 8:17 am
The justices were cautious at Tuesday morning’s argument in Samsung Electronics v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:43 am
Article 6, Section 2 of the Constitution says, “This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:18 am
Last week we learned that the United States government has asked for extra time to decide if it will intervene, and it has made clear that its intervention would either support the publishers or favor neither party. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
Section 253(8), for example, states that a technical capability notice “may be given to persons outside the United Kingdom (and may require things to be done, or not to be done, outside the United Kingdom). [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:49 pm
Over a decade and a half ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the loitering law’s blanket prohibition of all begging violates the First Amendment. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
Recovery of Medicaid Liens Upheld In 2011, the long-standing procedures regarding the recovery of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare Medicaid liens were upheld as valid by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on June 29, 2011 in its fifty-nine (59) paged decision in the case of Tristani v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
Germany's ban extends only to prisoners whose crimes target the integrity of the state or the democratic order, such as political insurgents. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
In briefs in both cases last month, the outgoing acting solicitor general, Jeffrey Wall, urged the justices to grant cert and vacate the court of appeals’ decisions (both of which went against Trump) under United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:41 am
Under Remmer v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the United States will formally withdraw from the Paris climate agreement. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm
Walker, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:48 am
Article 6, Section 2 of the Constitution says, “This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
