Search for: "United States v. Blanket" Results 581 - 600 of 911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:23 am by Adam Wagner
The UK had attempted to appeal the recent decision in Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:38 am by Andres
David Davis MP, Tom Watson MP and Others v the Secretary of State for the Home Department Today, the High Court found against the Government in David Davis’s and Tom Watson’s joint legal challenge to the Government’s emergency surveillance legislation. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 2:30 pm by Steven Koprince
United States, No. 14-233C (2014) involved a Defense Health Agency procurement for self-monitoring blood glucose strips. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-474, involving former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell’s challenge to his fraud conviction; and Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm by Anna Bower
United States Servicemen’s Fund and Bogan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
The blanket blocking of access to four online media outlets on the basis that of their articles featured allegedly unlawful content that promoted violence and religious extremism was found not to be “prescribed by law. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm by Stephanie Zable
The law permits a president to “deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States,” if he first declares a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act (NEA). [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 8:52 am
The Court has already emphasised, drawing on the provisions of Article 40 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989, the special position of minors in the criminal-justice sphere and has noted in particular the need for the protection of their privacy at criminal trials (see T. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24724/94, § § 75 and 85, 16 December 1999). [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:47 pm by John Lewis and Joseph S. Persoff
Recent decisions by both the California and United States Supreme Courts have found that state policies which unduly impede arbitration are invalid. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 10:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
Title 18, Section 713 regulates the use of likenesses of the great seal of the United States, the seals of the President and Vice President, the seal of the United States Senate, the seal of the United States House of Representatives, and the seal of the United States Congress. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am by Graeme Hall
Smith & Ors, R. v (Rev 1) [2011] EWCA Crim 1772 (19 July 2011): Court of Appeal: Blanket internet bans for Sexual Offences Prevention Orders always disproportionate; court gives general guidance. [read post]