Search for: "United States v. Booker"
Results 581 - 600
of 847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2007, 4:48 am
Even under advisory guidelines scheme emplaced by United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 12:59 pm
A snippet from the paper's abstract follows: "In the two years since United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 4:33 pm
Booker," and here is the full abstract:In the two years since United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 9:35 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:27 pm
Helpfully, this opinion provides this effective account of the state of Rule 32(h) after Booker in the course of articulating the First Circuit's approach: It appears that only the Seventh Circuit has held that Rule 32 no longer requires notice even for departures, having concluded that, after Booker, "the concept of departures [is] 'obsolete' and 'beside the point.'" United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:11 am
United States, 501 U.S. 129 (1991)] ... [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 6:16 am
United States, 277 U.S. 438, 485 (1928)(Brandeis, J., dissenting).Download sutton_opinion.pdf [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 5:51 am
The vote was 185 to 1 in favor of abolition, and the United States was the lone dissenter. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:40 am
As noted in this prior post, a Sixth Circuit panel earlier this month indicated that all three members would strongly recommend" en banc review of the "important question" of "whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 5:54 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 10:22 am
A defendant convicted of illegal re-entry and use of false identification got a reprieve from the draconian applicable Sentencing Guidelines last week in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 11:24 am
But in a new opinion released Oct. 11 in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in 2005 upended the federal sentencing guidelines in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 4:59 am
United States and Kimbrough v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:20 pm
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:38 am
Here is the abstract:Federal judges have struggled mightily to comprehend the meaning and impact of the Supreme Court's landmark sentencing decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 7:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
This case is on appeal from the district court's resentencing of Joseph Story in light of United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 6:40 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 10:11 am
United States v. [read post]
