Search for: "United States v. Carter" Results 581 - 600 of 865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2015, 11:13 am by Lyle Denniston
Since the Constitution was adopted, the United States has always had two levels of government — a national government that handles things which affect the states collectively, and state governments that look after matters within their borders. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:15 am by Broc Romanek
" In this order, the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia found that - in AFLAC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Adam Feldman
The United States had one amicus brief this term with a composite score of over 90. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 8:46 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The Plaintiff States sued the United States' Government Defendants in April 2021 to preemptively challenge the Interim Estimates. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am by Anthony Gaughan
Iqbal (and the 2007 case of Bell Atlantic v Twombly) held is insufficient to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On 12 June 2023 Nicklin J dealt with directions in the committal application in Davies v Carter. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Anderson
Kennedy stated that he reveres Marshall as “one of the greatest jurists not only in the history of the United States, but in the history of the world. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Civil process may be employed in a common law criminal contempt prosecution, as was the case in United Nurses. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:54 pm
United States Steel Corp., 881 N.E.2d 1065 (Ind. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 5:49 pm
In the case of U.S. v Wilson (32 US 150) the Supreme Court stated that a pardon is like a gift that can be refused, upholding the notion in Burdick v U.S. (236 US 79). [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
 Stefano Barazza talks us through Medtronic v Mirowski in this PatLit post. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm by Guest Blogger
Before joining the Court, Justice Kavanaugh had voiceddoubts about the soundness of the Watergate precedents, specifically, the Court’s unanimous United States v. [read post]