Search for: "United States v. Central State Bank" Results 581 - 600 of 1,077
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2015, 8:58 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Bitcoin doesn’t rely on an exchange of paper and there is no centralized bank that records your transaction. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 12:17 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Yet the allies are united at the United Nations, where the United States, France, Britain and Germany have urged the Security Council to investigate Iran's ballistic missile test from last week, which they argue violated the terms of a 2010 UNSC resolution banning Iran from conducting such tests. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm by Ingrid Wuerth
Section 8772 permits the attachment or execution of certain blocked financial assets of the Bank Markazi held in the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
As ever, SCOTUSBlog has the details on the case, Bank Markazi v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 2:54 pm by Ronald Mann
The United States (as an amicus) weighs in to support the contractor. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:51 am by Alex Loomis
”  Granted, not all data is covered by the European Directive (bank transfers and hotel bookings, for example, are excluded), but about 4500 companies nevertheless rely on the safe harbor framework to transfer commercial data from Europe to the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
The case filed by Iran’s central bank, Bank Markazi v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:07 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Eichler, Jr.Case number: 12-cv-10692 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case filed: December 14, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 11, 2015 7/31/2015 10/29/2015 2015-75 SEC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 7:04 am by David Lake
The problem of where residual authority resided was not solved until the Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:38 am
An explicit statement that courts’ regulating their own procedure was a proper judicial function came a few days later, in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:56 am
United Financial Group, 559 F.2d 557 (U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 11:45 am by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
Iraqi efforts will likely be helped by the four F-16 fighter jets that arrived in Baghdad from the United States this Monday. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 11:54 am by Eugene Kontorovich
The central point here is that the United States and most of the West does not think that the West Bank is part of any country. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Financial System” states that the “the defendants and their co-conspirators relied heavily on the United States financial system in connection with their activities,” adding that “this reliance was significant and sustained and was one of the central methods and means through which they promoted and concealed their schemes. [read post]