Search for: "United States v. Certain Accounts" Results 581 - 600 of 4,874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2018, 2:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
In the face of a similar First Amendment challenge, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in U.S. v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 12:48 pm by Peter Margulies
That inaccurate premise may undermine global confidence in Centcom’s process for determining accountability. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:15 am by fraudfighters
On September 28, 2010, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in Schindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
DeStefano, Supreme Court Holds Employer Liable for Trying to Avoid Claims of Adverse Impact Discrimination   On June 29, the United States Supreme Court issued its highly-anticipated and highly-divisive decision in the “white firefighters case,” Ricci v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
This judge began his analysis of the motion by noting that to “`“state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the color of State law. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am by Marty Lederman
With Monday’s filing of the reply briefs by the government and the intervenors, the briefing in the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) prohibits the employment of illegal aliens in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm by Cicely Wilson
Justices Scalia and Thomas stated that the question here, as in every case in which neutral state action is said to deny equal protection on account of race, is whether the challenged action reflects a racially discriminatory purpose. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 9:25 am
United States was issued by the United States Court of Claims last week in a case involving a government-wide acquisition contract (“GWAC”) awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA) to provide technology products and services to the entire federal government. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:35 am by Jennifer Daskal
With more than 30 amicus briefs filed in the Microsoft Ireland case – including from members of Congress, the European Commission, the Chamber of Commerce, privacy advocates and dozens of media organizations – United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
While the criminal charges were dismissed due to the crimes being time-barred, the prosecutor still requested the Pesaro judge to issue a confiscation order for the bronze, based on Italian cultural heritage law.[14] While the Getty Trust opposed this order, in 2019 the Court of Cassation confirmed it, thus making it final under Italian law.[15] Legal Issues and the ECtHR Judgement In order to obtain the actual return of the statue, the Pesaro prosecutor had to seek the recognition and enforcement… [read post]