Search for: "United States v. Detente" Results 581 - 600 of 3,297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Catherine Morris
The recent findings of an international trial monitoring panel in the case of United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm by Micah Belden
[p232] But the facts above recited, and those set forth in Ex parte Endo, supra, show that the exclusion was but a part of an over-all plan for forceable detention. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm by Micah Belden
[p232] But the facts above recited, and those set forth in Ex parte Endo, supra, show that the exclusion was but a part of an over-all plan for forceable detention. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm by Micah Belden
[p232] But the facts above recited, and those set forth in Ex parte Endo, supra, show that the exclusion was but a part of an over-all plan for forceable detention. [read post]