Search for: "United States v. Felt" Results 581 - 600 of 2,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2008, 2:36 pm
"[The officer] effected a seizure by stating that he would detain the vehicle for up to an hour to await the arrival of a K-9 unit. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 10:55 am by Gene Quinn
Recently, I had the opportunity to sit down with Paul Michel, who we in the patent community know as the former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 7:22 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, it is fairly easy to make a determination that it was caused by exposure to asbestos fibers, since that is virtually the only cause of the deadly disease found in the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 4:26 am by SHG
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr discusses a good ruling out of the 9th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 8:46 am by David Oxenford
Last week, we wrote about two dissenting opinions in a Supreme Court decision that highlight the debate that is underway on the principles that govern defamation liability in the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:00 pm
See Code of Conduct for the United States Judges, Compendium Section § 1.1(c) (2009); cf. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
If you were to ask the average citizen what values define the United States, the answer would likely include the right to speak freely without fear of government censorship and a general commitment to a free press. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 1:01 pm by Florian Mueller
All things (including the state of proceeding) considered, Judge Orrick felt that it made sense, and that the focus of this case was on FRAND licensing issues. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:33 am by Mila Sohoni
The justices initially wanted Wall to explain how the government could reconcile its position in this case with its earlier position in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 2:53 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The High Court had felt bound by Court of Appeal jurisprudence to hold that English law was applicable, but granted a leapfrog appeal certificate to the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 10:08 am
On the other hand, given the way Risk handled coverage of the "sovereign immunity issue" in Sistrunk v United States of America I am not at all surprised. [read post]