Search for: "United States v. Garcia"
Results 581 - 600
of 827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Garcia v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 1:05 am
United States Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:29 am
One such case is United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:02 pm
” The State Labor Commissioner, Lilia Garcia-Brower, joined Gascon in the announcement, and stated, “California needs more criminal prosecutions of wage theft to protect workers and honest employers from unfair competition. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 12:49 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 1:30 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice
Panel Rejects Claim 300 Month Prison Term For Producing Child Pornography Too Severe
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:54 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:03 pm
VI; Pointer v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:44 am
” The lawsuit, Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:45 pm
California v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
Garcia, which asks whether federal law pre-empts a state prosecution for identity theft for using someone else’s Social Security number. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 9:02 pm
In the first, United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:14 pm
There is also one likely new hold: Garcia v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Garcia-Lara
• Williams v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 6:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
United States, 17-5684, Gates v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
Canon 3 (6) (A) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges prohibits judges from “public comment on the merits” of a pending or impending case. [read post]
