Search for: "United States v. Gay"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
Texas, United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 7:45 am
" If the state made Smith create a website for a gay marriage—just because she was willing to create one for a straight marriage—that would be compelled speech, which would violate her First Amendment rights. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
In 1999, Bill Wagner became a plaintiff in Howard v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 3:03 pm
Equality is not an option in the United States. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:50 am
“[Section 3 of DOMA] therefore violates the equal protection principles incorporated in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution,” wrote Judge Bryant. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
In Schroer v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage) and United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:52 am
It particularly refers to the practice of pursuing a case in England and Wales, in preference to other jurisdictions, such as the United States, which provide more extensive defences for those accused of making derogatory statements. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
” Famous cases in which the Court has held that speech was impermissibly compelled include: West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Beshear 14-574Issue: (1) Whether a state violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment by prohibiting gay men and lesbians from marrying an individual of the same sex; and (2) whether a state violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment by refusing to recognize legal marriages between individuals of the same sex performed in other jurisdictions. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 8:18 am
Instead, the lawsuit builds on a 2003 United States Supreme Court decision, Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 6:39 am
Medical Justice, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1925 (Admin) (26 July 2010) - Read judgment The High Court has ruled that a fast-track scheme for the removal of failed asylum seekers with little or no notice is unlawful as it does not provide sufficient access to justice. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
” The New York Law Journal analyzes the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 8:44 pm
United States, 323 U. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:30 am
The state's objective is undoubtedly compelling: promoting equality in daily life for gay Americans. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:13 pm
Its roots are in the Supreme Court's 1943 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 12:14 pm
Unlike every other court ruling — federal or state — since the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
Relying on a recent ruling from United States District Court Judge Callie Granade, based in Mobile, that struck down the provision in the Alabama state constitution that prohibits recognition of same-sex marriage, many gay and lesbian couples around the state began getting marriage licenses. [read post]
