Search for: "United States v. Jordan" Results 581 - 600 of 947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 5:45 am by Benjamin Pollard
Blazakis argued that the gender pay gap among athletes in the United States presents a national security threat, as elucidated by the Russian trial of WNBA star Brittney Griner. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:33 am by Emma Snell
Miriam Jordan reports for the New York Times. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 9:06 am
He pledged that the United States would do its part to make these efforts successful, working closely with the international community and these partners as they fulfill their responsibilities as well. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
” At Slate (via How Appealing), Lorelai Laird writes that United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm by Andrew Hamm
Todd Gaziano and Reed Hopper for Town Hall preview United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also issued one opinion yesterday: In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
In The New York Times, Miriam Jordan reports that the court’s ruling has cast doubt on the prospects of refugees seeking resettlement in the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
This list was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate the needed assistance. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5684; farewell Gates v. [read post]