Search for: "United States v. Lawrence" Results 581 - 600 of 1,732
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court ruled 7-0 (without the participation of Justice Elena Kagan) that the advisory federal sentencing guidelines are not subject to vagueness challenges under the due process clause. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:32 am
United States, No. 16-5454, Justice Thomas issued a dissent from the denial of certiorari. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Facebook has said that a legal challenge against the way it transfers EU user data to the United States was “deeply flawed” and should not be referred to the EU’s top court because ample privacy protections were already in place. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
In the Kentucky Law Journal, law student Jordan Shewmaker looks at Honeycutt v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:15 am
In 2013, Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority in Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm by Jamie Baker
Professor Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:06 pm by Molly Runkle
” In 2013, President Barack Obama nominated Pryor to serve on the United States Sentencing Commission and he currently serves as Acting Chair. [read post]
And gay people can now marry, thanks to a changing climate of opinion, and thanks to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:56 pm
 Did you know that the landmark gay rights case Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Lawrence Hurley at Reuters. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
United States that a close relationship between a tipper and tippee can be enough to impose insider trading liability. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a bank-fraud case, rejecting Lawrence Shaw’s argument that he could not be found liable under the federal bank-fraud statute if he only intended to defraud a third party, not the bank itself, and remanding for consideration of questions about the jury instructions. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 7:42 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
United States [SCOTUSblog materials] that a defendant's argument that he should not be convicted of bank fraud because because he only intended to cheat a bank depositor is unpersuasive. [read post]