Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 581 - 600
of 9,148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2023, 1:21 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 4:22 am
United States and Overton v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 7:30 am
Meenaxi began distributing its THUMS UP and LIMCA products in the United States in 2008 and registered the marks in 2012. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:41 am
Notably, the United States Supreme Court, in Ohio v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:06 pm
Clark v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 3:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
My team is the United States armed forces. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 5:17 pm
In the groundbreaking 2019 ruling Ching v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 6:08 am
If we are wrong and state tax laws favoring in-state municipal bonds are shielded by United Haulers, it will mark a significant extension of the nascent state-run business exception to the Dormant Commerce Clause. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 12:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 2:00 am
United States, 424 U.S. 800 (1976). [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO) found that Unilever had sold large quantities of and publicised the goods designated by its CTM IMPULSE (which seem to be some sort of perfumed and/or deodorant body spray) the United Kingdom and Italy, with that mark enjoying a 5% market share in the United Kingdom and a 0.2% market share in Italy. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 12:07 pm
It is critical to conduct a trademark clearance search prior to filing any trademark application at the United States Patent & Trademark Office, including an application seeking registration for a mark that includes a surname. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:26 am
PepsiCo, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:22 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm
Especially in the western United States, sprawling homeless encampments have become ubiquitous, to the disgust and dismay of local residents. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:48 pm
In 2003, he pled guilty to one count of “counterfeit of a registered mark” in violation of California Penal Code § 350(a)(2), which imposes criminal penalties on any person who “willfully manufactures, intentionally sells, or knowingly possesses for sale any counterfeit of a mark registered with the Secretary of State or registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark… [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:59 am
’s well-settled status in the United States. [read post]