Search for: "United States v. Mitchell"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,001
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:55 pm
As Justices Thomas and Scalia discuss in their separate dissents in Mitchell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:51 pm
Mitchell, in 1970, upheld federal power to force states to allow 18-year-olds to vote. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 12:02 pm
For starters, there’s the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA), which requires a state to register for federal elections any person who resides outside the United States and (but for such residence) would be qualified to vote in that state if it was the last place in which the person was domiciled before leaving the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
Townsend and United States v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:34 am
The ACLU is direct counsel in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 11:53 am
Indian Civil Rights Act)United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:43 am
Court of Appeals pointed out recently in Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 6:38 am
Medical marijuana, a controlled substance, is illegal under federal law in the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 2:56 pm
Mitchell L. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
United States, 11-820. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:52 am
At his Arizona Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog, Lawrence Koplow wrote about Arizona State Hospital v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
The court was told that after the third report was completed and sent to all parties, the complainer, solicitor Ms Crabbe, stated that the reporter had not seen all the documentation he was supposed to have. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:50 pm
In contrast to SMARA, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in CBD v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am
It’s interesting that the United States hasn’t relied on the Elections Clause in its defense of Sections 4(b) and 5. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 2:26 pm
” United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:27 am
The TTSCA is Congress’ answer to a Second Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
