Search for: "United States v. Nice" Results 581 - 600 of 1,556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
With representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, Australia, Germany, India and many more countries, it truly lived up to both its name and its stated goal. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Barney, 129 U.S. 677, 682 (1889), and maintained in United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 6:58 am by Venkat
Second, it allows creditors to proceed against domain names where the registry is located, thus allowing creditors to proceed against domain names in one proceeding and more importantly levy against domain names located abroad (where the registry is located in the United States). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm by Mary Minow
Peter Hirtle, Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center Advisory Board It is very difficult to determine whether works are in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
  * No More (Trade Mark) Trouble With Harry (Winston) Marie-Andrée recounts the melting tale of the Winston family, where Harry built up a worldwide famous jewellery company in 1932 which now tries to prevent his son Bruce from registering his own name and surname as a trade mark for jewellery with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:37 am
Unfortunately, people in Missouri and across the United States have frequently had trouble actually using those benefits, because insurance companies save money when they can deny claims. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:30 pm
That was after he’d seen a brief Sungaila had filed in a domestic-violence-related lawsuit against the United States before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. [read post]