Search for: "United States v. Nixon"
Results 581 - 600
of 845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Department of Justice and was an assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 8:11 am
Paul, Minnesota, ruled in Phelps-Roper v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 6:19 pm
United States, 134 S. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
., filed a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:15 am
United States that “the President has the exclusive authority to remove executive branch officials. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 6:43 am
United States (1993) concurrence. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:48 pm
The Perry case is widely anticipated to end up in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
The Coca-Cola Company v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:30 am
Nixon v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
Nixon (1974) (which involved a third-party trial subpoena for a federal criminal case not targeting the president) and Clinton v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm
Michael Flynn’s contacts with the Russian ambassador to the United States, were likely protected by executive privilege. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
After losing before the New Jersey Supreme Court, Princeton appealed to the United States Supreme Court with an absurd argument that their institutional First Amendment rights were violated by requiring that it allow people like my client on campus. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm
United States that the evacuation order was legal. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 4:49 am
[v] I don’t think it was even close. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
During Tuesday’s oral argument before the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
And Fisher notes that Stevens hinted this Term in his United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:04 pm
United States, PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:22 am
After Nixon left office, the Supreme Court, in Train v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:49 am
But recognizing that the U.S. needed tools to quickly address emerging national security threats that fall short of war, Congress in parallel enacted IEEPA to give the president broad powers to respond to “any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States. [read post]
