Search for: "United States v. Riley" Results 581 - 600 of 743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
United States The Committee to Protect Journalists issued an alert for the New York City Police Department which should refrain from subpoenaing journalists’ phone records or other information that could reveal sourcing. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The problem was based on United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
Such a content-based trigger would in effect be a "content-based penalty" on the speech that triggers the hosting obligation, just as a content-based tax would be.[148]) The law in Riley v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm by Andrew Dat
This case may sound like legal nerd stuff, but I assure you that unlike a lot of the corporate nonsense cases that the court has been entertaining as of late, the outcome of United States of America v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:54 pm by Rory Little
The city claims that there are over a hundred “similar” ordinances or statutes across the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:02 am by Jonathan Hafetz
United States (Al-Bahlul II), which upheld the petitioner’s conviction for conspiracy. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Riley v Sivier, heard 11 December 2020 (Collins-Rice J). [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:22 am by Rishabh Bhandari
Nick also analyzed how the iPhone’s TouchID feature intersects with the concept of a warrantless search as was determined in Riley v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Susan Landau
Given the extent of personal information on an individual’s phone, such searches have been found to contravene Fourth Amendment protections; in Riley v. [read post]