Search for: "United States v. Rock" Results 581 - 600 of 1,330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 7:32 am by Kevin Goldberg
Tam filed an application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to register “The Slants” as a federal trademark. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 1:50 pm by Amy Howe
United States … to adopt a workable standard for delineating the Act’s reach. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 10:40 am
What makes Martek Biosciences strange is not so much the argument between the majority and dissent about whether the claim term [...]...Foreign Patent Owners Safe From Declaratory JudgmentIn a decision that is simply painful to read, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit yesterday decided in Autogenomics v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm by Keith Rizzardi
United States Department of Transportation, 452 F.3d 362 (5th Cir. 2006)(until final approval was granted on an application, there was “insufficient certainty about the facilities’ future construction and environmental consequences to include them in the cumulative impact calculus. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court in the landmark case, Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association et al v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
For example, Chief Justice Warren’s deferential approach to Congress in United States v. [read post]
The team appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which is also located in Virginia, but that court put off ruling on the case until after the U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:28 am by Robert D. Williams
The wait is over: a judgment has been issued in the Philippines v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, in which the Court voided the conviction of a man who had taken spent shell casings from a government bombing range because he thought they were abandoned. [read post]
1 May 2015, 6:00 am by Hayley Roberts
’  Article 287(3) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (LOSC), which both States are party to, requires States to select a preferred means of binding dispute resolution involving third parties, and if they fail to do so, arbitration under Annex VII becomes the default means – unless reservations have been made in writing with regard to optional exceptions (see below). [read post]