Search for: "United States v. Starks"
Results 581 - 600
of 837
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2012, 3:39 am
If smartphone and tablet computers become immune to injunction requests only because they incorporate large numbers of features, a whole category of patents (with many subcategories) is devalued in the United States, forcing patent holders to rely on injunction-friendlier jurisdictions abroad.Judge Koh's decision was unprecedented and expected at the same time. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:58 am
On October 15, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Jovani Fashion, Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
” At the birth of the United States, copyright was couched in terms of property more often that not. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:52 am
Florida v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:31 pm
The latest pronouncements on this issue came from the Fourth District Court of Appeal as well as the United State District Court for the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am
However, in the last fifty years, the United States has removed those values of relying on one’s self and neighbors. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:47 am
Recently, in Miller v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Department of State, respectively: ? [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
Apple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:28 pm
Preventive Care / Contraceptive Rule: In another case seeking relief from the Affordable Care Act Preventative Services (contraceptives) Rule, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the complaint in Wheaton College v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:13 am
” In Muellenberg v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am
From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
United States Forest Service, ___ F.3d ___, 2012 U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:58 am
By V. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
In the wake of NFIB v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:16 pm
In Invensas Corporation v. [read post]
