Search for: "United States v. State of NY" Results 581 - 600 of 2,862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
Yesterday the New York State Department of Financial Services issued Circular Letter No. 11 (2019) RE: New York State Child Victims Act and Related Insurance. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  2019 NY Slip Op 32472(U)  August 20, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653567/2018 Judge: Francis A. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:24 am by Joel R. Brandes
Third, she argued she should not have to reimburse Pinto for enforcing the Mexican custody order since she claimed her Mexican lawyer said she could take the children to the United States without violating that order. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Giller v Kate, Nussman, Ellis Farhi & Earle, LLP 2019 NY Slip Op 32301(U) July 31, 2019  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 156885/2018 Judge: W. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
He failed to show that his legal malpractice claims premised on defendants’ representation of him in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York were not time-barred (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 300, 306 [2002]). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
He failed to show that his legal malpractice claims premised on defendants’ representation of him in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York were not time-barred (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 300, 306 [2002]). [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 4:22 pm by NBlack
Shaw,15 CV 3738 (ARR) (CLP), where United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of New York, Cheryl L. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 4:22 pm by NBlack
Shaw,15 CV 3738 (ARR) (CLP), where United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of New York, Cheryl L. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am by Kia Rahnama
The Supreme Court has already directly borrowed this principle in analyzing the scope of congressional contempt power, stating in Anderson v. [read post]