Search for: "United States v. State of New Jersey" Results 581 - 600 of 3,506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm by Don Maurice
It is a great, sound analysis and the holding is consistent with opinions from the United States District Courts in New Jersey and Massachusetts. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 3:34 pm by admin
  Having exhausted his appeals in the New Jersey state court system, Kamienski then appealed to the federal district court for the District of New Jersey for a writ of habeas corpus. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:40 am
In a recent decision from New Jersey, the district court granted a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:26 am
 On February 9, 2009, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey decided the case of Martin v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:48 am by PaulKostro
Guadagno, P.J.F.P., DOCKET NUMBER FD-13-0395-05, February 17, 2011: Where a minor child’s “home state” pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-29-31 is New Jersey, pursuant to New Jersey Law, specifically N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 and N.J.S.A. 2C:13-4 as well as N.J.S.A. 2A:34-31.1 in aid of the application of Article 15 of the Hague Convention or the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, 25 October 1980, codified at 42 U.S.C. 11601 et seq., a… [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:45 pm
This breaking news post is from Bexis only, as Wyeth - a major HRT defendant - is a big Herrmann client.The New Jersey state court judge in Middlesex County has just issued a couple of good rulings. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 6:44 am by Stephen J. Natoli
In New Jersey, a criminal defendant’s right to a jury trial is guaranteed by both the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the State Constitution. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 am by Kory A. Crichton
The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division answered this question on April 11, 2022 in Christine Ann Devers v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 6:28 pm by Ilya Somin
The federal argument also claims that New Jersey's information-sharing restrictions violate the doctrine of "intergovernmental immunity" which bars state laws that "regulate the United States directly or discriminate against the Federal Government or those with whom it deals. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:05 am by PaulKostro
Div. 1987) (the Maryland defendants solicitation in New Jersey of offers to purchase its truck was sufficient contact to support both a New Jersey action arising from such sale and out-of-state service on defendant); Unicon Investments v. [read post]