Search for: "VIKRAM AMAR"
Results 581 - 600
of 651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Vikram David Amar maintains that “[t]his week’s decision by Justice Samuel Alito … to leave undisturbed the congressional districting ruling last month by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court … is a helpful reminder of the importance of state courts and state constitutions in safeguarding American democracy. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:02 am
” Additional commentary comes from Vikram David Amar and Alan Brownstein at Justia’s Verdict blog, who remark that “what may be most memorable and important in this opinion is not the analytic moves it makes, but the tone it employs and the message about respect, civility, and dignity it tries to send. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:29 am
Our brief, filed on behalf of CAC and six of the nation’s most prominent constitutional scholars – Bruce Ackerman, Vikram Amar, Jack Balkin, Burt Neuborne, James Ryan, and Adam Winkler – demonstrates that the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment permit government to take race into account in certain circumstances in order to ensure equality of opportunity for all persons regardless of race. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
At Verdict, Vikram David Amar discusses the Court’s summary reversal of the Ninth Circuit last week in the habeas case of Cavazos v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am
At Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the legislature’s brief in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Also at Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the possible procedural defects in Fisher v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:29 am
Roeca, 2009 president of The Bar Association of San Francisco05/26/09 Los Angeles Times, "You Just Can't Change Marriage", by Andrew Pugno, attorney for Yes on 8 / ProtectMarriage.com05/27/09 Los Angeles Times, comments by Goodwin Liu, Vikram Amar, Jesse H. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
At VERDICT, Vikram Amar analyzes the issues in M.B.Z. v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:10 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Vikram David Amar discusses the court’s approach to precedent in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 11:13 am
Amar of the UC Davis School of Law, Jesse H. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Given the difficulty of amending the Constitution, it will not likely be abolished any time soon.Accordingly, reformers have been seeking to circumvent the Electoral College without a constitutional amendment, based on an idea originally proposed by law professors including my fellow Verdict columnist Dean Vikram Amar. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:46 am
It is true, incidentally, that Akhil and Vikram Amar have written a wonderful article plausibly arguing that the Succession in Office Act is unconstitutional, and I believe that it is perhaps even worse than unconstitutional, i.e., monumentally stupid. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm
In fact, some of these legal experts recommend a single term of 18 years for Supreme Court Justices, including Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram David Amar writing in Should U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:01 am
Professors Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram David Amar have put forward an Intermediate View: the elected President is an "officer of the United States," but members of Congress are not. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 1:33 pm
Professor Vikram David Amar wrote in 2004 that Justice Stevens’ position is “quite scary” and could result in a Catch-22 for plaintiffs: “Give up an activity that they believe (and a district court agrees) is constitutionally protected, or risk criminal prosecution down the road if the district court is reversed. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 1:33 pm
Professor Vikram David Amar wrote in 2004 that Justice Stevens’ position is “quite scary” and could result in a Catch-22 for plaintiffs: “Give up an activity that they believe (and a district court agrees) is constitutionally protected, or risk criminal prosecution down the road if the district court is reversed. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
Professors Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram David Amar have put forward an Intermediate View: the elected President is an "officer of the United States," but members of Congress are not. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
As Professor (and then-Dean) Vikram Amar and Professor Jason Mazzone noted on Verdict, Dean Martinez sensibly committed to educating rather than punishing the students who had disrupted the talk.Dean Martinez’s letter also blamed “staff members who should have enforced university policies [but] failed to do so, and instead intervened in inappropriate ways that are not aligned with the university’s commitment to free speech. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm
I wrote an amicus brief in this case with Yale Sterling Professor of Law, Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram D. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:14 am
Burwell).In a 5-4 opinion by Justice Samuel Alito, the Court held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) permits a closely held for-profit corporation to deny its employees the health coverage of contraceptives to which the employees are otherwise entitled by the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA), based on the religious objections of the corporation’s owners.Here is some commentary tracking the progress of these cases before the Court’s… [read post]
