Search for: "Vessels v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
Take Our Poll (5) United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 6:58 am
On 16 December 2015, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Société Coopérative de Production SeaFrance SA v The Competition and Markets Authority. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 3:43 pm
However, the constitutionality of these state-level measures have come under scrutiny in the pending case Micron Technology v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
Human traffickers, who charged $2000 per person for the journey, abandoned the “floating coffin” vessel when the engine broke down. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
California and United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:37 am
The vessel owner notified LSM that the ship would be docking in Texas to discharge pipes, which had been loaded by a third party outside the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:37 am
The vessel owner notified LSM that the ship would be docking in Texas to discharge pipes, which had been loaded by a third party outside the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:52 pm
Per Oldfield v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm
The M/ V Cape Flattery had run aground on a submerged coral reef off Hawaii; the vessel entered into a salvage agreement with Titan Maritime that contained an arbitration clause: “Any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration in London . . .in accordance with the English Arbitration Act 1996 . . ., English law and practice to apply. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:08 am
Yesterday, the Court upheld the sentence in the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 10:00 pm
The cruise line never reported the incident to the Alaska State Troopers, or the FBI, or the flag state. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:17 pm
Of significant note was the court’s discussion of Thurmond v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:17 pm
Of significant note was the court’s discussion of Thurmond v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 3:19 am
Mongolian Government [2005] EWCA Civ 395; and (ii) Wuhan Guoyu Logistics Group Co Lt v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 7:14 am
Inc., v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
United States, 459 F.2d 631, 635 (9th Cir. 1972); see also, Black v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 2:50 am
The vessel was not refixed until several weeks later, and the issue of whether damages were payable by the charterers for cancelling the fixture went to arbitration. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 1:26 am
The Claimant objected, and stated that any substitution would be subject to approval by the Recipient. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
As a result of a federal court decision on March 4, 2015 (Perez v. [read post]
