Search for: "Vikram Amar" Results 581 - 600 of 641
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2009, 2:42 pm
., University of Texas Law School Kermit Roosevelt, University of Pennsylvania Lawrence Lessig, Stanford Law School Orin Kerr, George Washington Law School Vikram Amar, U.C. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 3:49 pm
A snippet: "Constitutional scholar Vikram Amar said he believes that the Schock bill would pass muster; another scholar, Laurence H. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 6:28 am
“When you want a law to apply retroactively, usually you have to be explicit about it,” says Vikram Amar, a professor at the University of California, Davis, School of Law. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:16 am
"The court is always reluctant to overturn a ballot initiative," said attorney Vikram Amar, who teaches constitutional law at University of California-Davis. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:01 pm
The third panel at the Santa Clara Law Review symposium on "Big Business and the Roberts Court: Explaining the Court's Receptiveness to Business Interests," featured Vikram Amar (UC Davis), Pam... [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 8:19 am
See Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram David Amar, Is the Presidential Succession Law Constitutional? [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 6:53 pm
See Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram David Amar, Is the Presidential Succession Law Constitutional? [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 3:45 am
"Analyzing the Two Key Arguments in the California Supreme Court Case Regarding the Anti-Same-Sex-Marriage Proposition Eight": Vikram David Amar has this essay online at FindLaw. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 8:37 pm
Speaker of the House Obama (or McCain), who will, of course, have resigned his Senate seat in the interim, will succeed to the presidency immediately and then take the oath for the full four-year term on January 20, as the unamended Constitution provides.There is one embarrassment in my suggesting this solution, however: Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram Amar argued in a brilliant Stanford Law Review article several years ago that the Succession in Office Act is unconstitutional,… [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 6:01 am
As the first Monday in October looms nearer, attention is beginning to focus on this case again, and where it might be heading.In an article at Findlaw, courtesy of Bashman, Cal Davis Lawprof Vikram David Amar suggests that Herring might be the opportunity Justice Scalia has been looking for to finally put an end to the exclusionary rule. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 2:54 pm
In commentary available online from FindLaw: Vikram David Amar has an essay entitled "An Important Upcoming Supreme Court Case Raises Questions About Both the Fourth Amendment and the Weight of Precedent. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:22 pm
Vikram Amar looks to several First Amendment cases (among others) to identify some notable Court trends that have emerged under Chief Justice Roberts over the past two terms. [read post]
8 May 2008, 5:50 pm
Lots of people have said interesting things about the Court's upholding of the Indiana Voter ID statute, including Rick Hasen  (in a 2006 piece in Slate, voter ID laws in Slate, and a more recent piece here)   Vikram Amar, Dan Filler, and Edward Foley and Dan Tokaji. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 12:27 pm
On FIndlaw, UC Davis law professors Vikram Amar and Alan Brownstein analyze the issues presented in the Summum monument case, set to be heard by the Supreme Court next year. [read post]