Search for: "W & W Holdings, LLC" Results 581 - 600 of 1,514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2012, 9:49 am by nflatow
For example, the Roberts’ Court presumed workers’ acquiescence in a union-employer agreement to waive employees’ right to a jury trial in a Title VII case. 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 8:29 am by Steven Koprince
The GAO’s bid protest decision in Harmonia Holdings, LLC, B-407186.2, B-407186.3 (Mar. 5, 2013), involved a Social Security Administration solicitation for geographic information system services. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:25 am by Cyrus E. Phillips IV
Cir. 1995), which holds that “[w]hen the Contract Disputes Act applies, it provides the exclusive mechanism for dispute resolution: the Contract Disputes Act was not designed to serve as an alternative administrative remedy, available at the contractor’s option. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:35 am by tracey
Ltd (t/a Toyo Tires of Japan) & Anor [2011] EWHC 1993 (QB) (27 July 2011) BGC Capital Markets (Switzerland) LLC v Rees & Ors [2011] EWHC 2009 (QB) (27 July 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 5:47 am
Representing Appellee (Defendant): Timothy W. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:18 pm by Randall Reese
(OTC Bulletin Board: ULEI and ULEI-W), Ultimate Escapes Holdings, LLC (proposed lead case), and dozens of affiliates voluntarily filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Delaware. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
” With respect to the language dividing the “future retirement disbursements,” the mediator instructed that specific language be included in the divorce decree: W-6: 50.00% of HUSBAND’s future retirement disbursements from ISI Specialist, Inc. and/or Brand Industrial Specialist, LLC arising out of HUSBAND’s employment with ISI Specialist, Inc. and/or Brand Industrial Specialist, LLC as will be more particularly defined in a Qualified Domestic… [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:36 pm
And to the extent this statement is ambiguous, we note that the Supreme Court has stated “[w]here no explanation is established . . . the court should presume that the patent applicant had a substantial reason related to patentability for including the limiting element added by amendment. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 6:12 pm by Tomassi Law Associates
The exchange took place Monday on Day 14 of a riveting trial thats wrapping up before Judge Alvin W. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
” Fourth, “[w]hen one contributes something of value to a business, she no longer fully owns that asset. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:01 am
Crank, Attorney General; John W. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:44 am
Usually, it is dispositive; it is the single best guide to the meaning of a disputed term.'"; "[w]illfulness does not equate to fraud, and thus, the pleading requirement for willful infringement does not rise to the stringent standard required by Rule 9(b). [read post]