Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of" Results 581 - 600 of 936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2010, 10:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
However, you might be able to convince the court, even if it doesn’t grant the TRO, that it’s a close call deserving an expedited schedule. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 3:19 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
No matter the external pressures or intrinsic rewards, meaningful change doesn’t just happen. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am by Steve Bainbridge
“[W]here it is claimed that a duty of disclosure violation impaired the stockholders' right to cast an informed vote, that claim is direct. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am by Steve Vladeck
The following post tries to clarify what’s been settled and what hasn’t. 1. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:52 am by Heidi Henson
The Court also concluded (as a threshold matter) that the Anti-Injunction Act did not bar the suit. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
But no indictment was ever returned, leading to speculation that the grand jury probing the matter took the rare step of rejecting charges. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The ToU say (quite implausibly, w/r/t the derivative works claim): CollegeSource® and Career Guidance Foundation CollegeSource® digital catalogs are derivative works owned and copyrighted by CollegeSource®, Inc. and Career Guidance Foundation. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:35 pm by Thomas Kaufman
Nagareda: "'[W]hat really matters to class certification' is 'not similarity at some unspecified level of generality but, rather, dissimilarity that has the capacity to undercut the prospects for joint resolution of class members' claims through a unified proceeding. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat)   United States US General U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 8:19 am by Chip Merlin
In the insurance dispute that followed, the District Court granted summary judgment in favor of the insurance company because the yacht’s owners, Mr. and Mrs. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:18 am by Peter Mahler
” The plaintiff then appealed to the Superior Court which, unfortunately for him, agreed with the company that the specific adjustments mentioned in the buy-sell provision were not exclusive; that “adjustments based on minority interest and lack of marketability are standard industry practice when valuing shares in closely held corporations”; and that “[w]hile the parties could have contracted to exclude other adjustments, they did not do so here. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:40 am by Amy Howe
Trustee and a group of Canadian creditors – made up of Canadian cities and First Nations –counter that it doesn’t matter whether the U.S. [read post]