Search for: "Wales v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States Donald Trump’s legal team wants a defamation claim that was filed against the President by a former contestant on reality show the Apprentice to be dismissed on the grounds that it is politically motivated. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
It points out that 83 MEPs from the 6 largest parliamentary groups and from 18 different member states have signed up to the 10 point “WePromiseEU” Charter. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
The pilot scheme allowing journalists to report on cases at family courts in England and Wales has been expanded to include private law. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
United States: A Haitian-American journalist has been ordered to never again publish anything about the prime minister of Haiti [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:47 am by Jessie Elizabeth Shifalo
Attached to the policy was a cover note with its own forum-selection clause which selected any court of competent jurisdiction within the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
On 14 March 2022, the Supreme Court denied Julian Assange permission to appeal against the High Court’s decision to extradite him to the United State as the application did not raise an arguable point of law. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 10:17 am by Jan von Hein
Requirements to be met by the claimant and pre-action correspondence In the aftermath of the VW-Porsche takeover battle, an investor based on the Cayman Islands announced to sue Porsche SE in the High Court of England and Wales. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
United States A Derry priest has been granted permission to sue an American Catholic Diocese for defamation. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
United States: A couple from Texas have been awarded $13.8 million in a defamation case against anonymous posters on the internet forum Topix.com, who had accused them of being sexual deviants, molesters, and drug dealers reports ABC News. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Notice and takedown is discussed without even naming the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (the most discussed and one of the most elaborate NTD schemes, dealing with IP rights in the United States), let alone its strengths and flaws which have been well debated. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
 Meanwhile the annual IP Publishers and Editors lunch on 7 December, also in London (click here and scroll down for details) has gone one better, with 44 participants signed up from as far afield as the United States and Germany. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 11:30 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
The courts John Hugh Brady v the United Kingdom – 37536/08 [2012] ECHR 965 (22 May 2012). [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
What is happening to the Peer-to-Patent project in the United States? [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
There was widespread coverage of the case of NT1 v Google – the first “right to be forgotten” case to be tried in England and Wales. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
United States A judge has ruled that Rep. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
United States The Guardian had a piece “Chicago mayor sued by journalist for limiting interviews to reporters of color”. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
A firm in South Wales has been fined £60,000 by the ICO for allowing its telephone lines to be used to send spam texts. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
United States Last week, President Biden established the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which appears will be focusing particularly on online harms which “disproportionately affect women, girls, people of colour and LGBTQI+ individuals” with “technology-facilitated gender-based violence” its top priority. [read post]