Search for: "Washington v. Scott" Results 581 - 600 of 1,343
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2017, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” At Tax Notes, Scott Levine and Sean Jackowitz discuss Kokesh v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” In the Daily Bruin, Laurel Scott talks to students in the UCLA School of Law’s Supreme Court clinic who worked with law professor Stuart Banner on the briefing and argument in Nelson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
' Law, Medicine & Bioethics Session 2B – Room 241MalpracticeModerator: Charity Scott, Georgia State University College of LawBartlett Bryce, Duke Univer [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Liza Carens and Scott Cohen preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et… [read post]
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et… [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 5:03 am by Adriana S. Kosovych
A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Bruce Markell discusses Czyzewski v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
Andrew Maury and Scott Benjamin Cohen preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 6:02 am by Dennis Crouch
O’Connor, Boeing International Professor, University of Washington School of Law As most readers of this blog know, patent exhaustion is usually traced to Chief Justice Taney’s statement in the 1853 case of Bloomer v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:06 am by Scott Bomboy
In an original jurisdiction lawsuit, Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:18 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Hernández v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:40 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro weighs in on Lee v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Lee v. [read post]