Search for: "Washington v. Smith" Results 581 - 600 of 1,566
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2016, 11:55 am by Dan Ernst
The Article III question is now the subject of a potentially landmark case, al Bahlul v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 2:33 pm
, but only this year did the opportunity arise for her attend the 2016 ChIPs Women in Tech, Law and Policy Global Summit held in Washington D.C. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am by Eric Baxter
Eric Baxter is Senior Counsel at The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in Washington, D.C. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 9:22 am by Nassiri Law
Additional Resources: Hugs and harassment accusations in $200K lawsuit against Metro, Aug. 15, 2016, By Max Smith, WTOP More Blog Entries: Griffin v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:05 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Parkinson’s Head Trauma Link Looks Even Stronger, July 11, 2016, Time, By Alice Park More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. (1965)  – Anne FlemingSylvester Smith, Unlikely Heroine: King v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 9:43 am by Ezra Rosser
Smith (1968) – Henry Freedman Legal Services Attorneys and Migrant Advocates Join Forces: Shapiro v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am by Bill Marler
  We have proudly represented such victims as Brianne Kiner, Stephanie Smith and Linda R [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am by David Kris
 Microsoft’s Chief Legal Officer, Brad Smith, testified in Congress in February, asking the House Judiciary Committee to “[i]magine the kind of meeting that I have had to have with a Brazilian employee [of Microsoft] who is being prosecuted [for refusing to comply with Brazilian law]. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:23 am by Mark Graber
Smith (1990), and mandating exemptions when, as appears to be the case in Washington, no strong reason exists for not giving religious pharmacists an exemption from the stocking and delivery rules. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
Wiesman, 15-862, involves a group of pharmacists who are challenging, under the Free Exercise Clause, a Washington state regulation that requires pharmacies to dispense lawfully prescribed drugs, but whose statutory exemptions don’t include one for religious objectors. [read post]